Operation Gladio

July 25th, 2005 at 21:27 Björn Hallberg

Kurt Nimmo of Another Day in the Empire raises important questions regarding the fallout from Operation Gladio in terms of active assets and the use of such tactics today.

Abdullah Azzam’s name rings a bell. A Palestinian university professor and member of the CIA-penetrated Muslim Brotherhood, Azzam set up the Services Office (Maktab al-Khadamat) a CIA- and Saudi-sponsored support organization for the mujahideen (through Prince Turki of Saudi intelligence) fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan, providing a network infrastructure based in Peshawar, Pakistan, that would later form the basis for al Qaeda, itself a CIA-ISI contrivance (see Gerecht, Atlantic Monthly, July 2001).

In short, the Sharm el-Sheik operation smells of CIA (in the current context, “CIA” translates into cooperation between several intelligence agencies—CIA, U.S. and British military intelligence, and Mossad—and “black” covert ops such as the bombings at Sharm el-Sheik are entirely off the books and use long-groomed assets such as al-Qaeda and other “Islamic terror” groups spawned by the long-compromised Muslim Brotherhood).

This can be said to constitute a second line of dissenting thinking, also largely shunted from the media and open debate.

It makes absolutely no sense for “al-Qaeda” (and its variants) to kill innocent civilians at Sharm el-Sheik or in the subways of London—unless we are to presume, as the state and its various corporate media propaganda ministries would have us believe, that Muslims simply embrace an “evil ideology” and engage in senseless and pointless violence without logical political objectives. It should be obvious this violence benefits the United States and its collaborators in a well-orchestrated effort to build a military and police super-state (a “New World Order,” for lack of a better term). Sharm el-Sheik is but another step in a global strategy of tension (and terror) designed to build a frightened and thus illogical consensus for repressive police state tactics.

So we have three versions here. (A) Terrorists are not compromised, but evil and it’s no use to try and understand them, they in fact have no plan at all. (B) Terrorists act in a roundabout way as a response to crimes against countries in the middle east and are a highly aware and political group. (C) Terrorists in most cases are illusions, created by various intelligence services in order to fight / prepare for a perceived threat and shape public opinion.

Entry 178 filed under: Media, North America, World. This entry was posted 3 years, 4 months ago. RSS feed for comments on this post.