Iraqi Constitution Analysis

October 15th, 2005 at 10:06 Björn Hallberg

GPF - The constitutional process culminating in Saturday’s referendum is not a sign of Iraqi sovereignty and democracy taking hold, but rather a consolidation of U.S. influence and control. Whether Iraq’s draft constitution is approved or rejected, the decision is likely to make the current situation worse.

The ratification process reflects U.S., not Iraqi urgency, and is resulting in a vote in which most Iraqis have not even seen the draft, and amendments are being reopened and negotiated by political parties and elites in Baghdad as late as four days before the planned referendum.

The proposed constitution would strip Iraqis of future control over their nation’s oil wealth by opening all new oil exploration and production to foreign oil companies.

The imposition of federalism as defined in the draft constitution undermines Iraqi national consciousness and sets the stage for a potential division of Iraq largely along ethnic and religious lines, with financial, military, and political power devolving from the central government to the regional authorities. All groups risk sectoral as well as national interests.

Human rights, including women’s rights, individual political and civil rights, economic and social rights, religious rights, minority rights, all remain at risk.

Instead of balancing the interests of Iraq’s diverse population by referencing its long- dominant secular approaches, the draft constitution reflects, privileges and makes permanent the current occupation-fueled turn towards Islamic identity.

See also:
How the US Got its Neoliberal way in Iraq
New Iraq Patent Law Will Make Traditional Farmers Seed Saving Illegal

Entry 280 filed under: Middle East. This entry was posted 3 years, 2 months ago. RSS feed for comments on this post.