The whitewashing of Ariel Sharon

January 12th, 2006 at 15:10 Björn Hallberg

Indeed, not to mention the obfuscation of the real issue (illegal occupation and its consequences) by producing this silly Sharon soap that ran continuously for days, especially in American media. One would be curious to know what sort of operations the IDF carried out while the mainstream media was virtually blanketed.

LAT (Saree Makdisi) - AS ARIEL SHARON’S career comes to an end, the whitewashing is already underway. Literally overnight he was being hailed as “a man of courage and peace” who had generated “hopes for a far-reaching accord” with an electoral campaign promising “to end conflict with the Palestinians.”

But even if end-of-career assessments often stretch the truth, and even if far too many people fall for the old saw about the gruff old warrior miraculously turning into a man of peace, the reality is that miracles don’t happen, and only rarely have words and realities been separated by such a yawning abyss.

From the beginning to the end of his career, Sharon was a man of ruthless and often gratuitous violence. The waypoints of his career are all drenched in blood, from the massacre he directed at the village of Qibya in 1953, in which his men destroyed whole houses with their occupants — men, women and children — still inside, to the ruinous invasion of Lebanon in 1982, in which his army laid siege to Beirut, cut off water, electricity and food supplies and subjected the city’s hapless residents to weeks of indiscriminate bombardment by land, sea and air.

SHARON’S “painful sacrifices” for peace may have involved Israel keeping less, rather than more, of the territory that it captured violently and has clung to illegally for four decades, but few seem to have noticed that it’s not really a sacrifice to return something that wasn’t yours to begin with.

See also: Who’s on life support: Sharon or Israel?

Entry 416 filed under: Middle East. This entry was posted 2 years, 12 months ago. RSS feed for comments on this post.